posted by ![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
pmsumner at 09:53pm on 25/05/2003
pmsumner at 09:53pm on 25/05/2003Overall rating? Half-marks.
Impressive visuals in places, not so impressive in others. Ground breaking ideas in places, but not stunningly executed. Bad plot development, too many convenient "things" put in place to explain away problematic issues. Too much "deep stuff" thrown into a short period of time. If it had been introduced gradually it would have been nicer to follow, but having a 10min speech explaining everything after you've been there for 2hrs already - isn't easy to follow.
Oh, and an unnecessary sex scene. Not particularly well done either, IMO.
Still enjoyed it. Want to see again to give a second chance, but will wait.
Impressive visuals in places, not so impressive in others. Ground breaking ideas in places, but not stunningly executed. Bad plot development, too many convenient "things" put in place to explain away problematic issues. Too much "deep stuff" thrown into a short period of time. If it had been introduced gradually it would have been nicer to follow, but having a 10min speech explaining everything after you've been there for 2hrs already - isn't easy to follow.
Oh, and an unnecessary sex scene. Not particularly well done either, IMO.
Still enjoyed it. Want to see again to give a second chance, but will wait.
There are 7 comments on this entry.