*looks out window* : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4 | |||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
a) their site is FULL of spelling and grammatical errors, which they make no effort to correct. they should employ me full time at 20k a year just to correct their mistakes. or employ english graduates instead of morons.
b) they rehash 50% of every new story from old stories. if you read 4 stories on the same issue they are all copied from each other. if prince charles broke his toe tomorrow, they'd tell you how he broke the other toe back in 1983, how it took 4 weeks to heal, and how at the time he said "i'm fine, go away and leave me alone". its the level of irrelevant copying and "fill" that really annoys me sometimes.
c) the great "spudserver" debacle back when i was at uni, when the BBC completely believed for 24 hours some postgrad friends of mine had created a webserver that ran from potatoes. they copy "news" from other websites without verifying it.
apart from this it loads fast (especially in text-only mode) and is generally well laid out. so i keep using it.