posted by ![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
pmsumner at 07:58pm on 29/09/2005 under interviews
pmsumner at 07:58pm on 29/09/2005 under interviewsVery short. Would have been under 20minutes from start to finish if I hadn't asked some questions at the end. I personally am taking this as a bad sign, but it may be a good sign.
I was asked for a time when I was innovative, how I'd deal with an irate customer, what hardware and software I was familiar with, to give an example of a time when I wrote a policy or procedure that was meant for general use. That's about it. I can't think of any more, but as I say, it was really short.
One of the people interviewing me was a resident - a user of the Eastserve scheme. One of them was the scheme/project manager, and one was the "office manager", I think.
I'm not entirely sure how it went. Whether a quick interview is good, bad or indifferent. I'll apparently know by tomorrow afternoon either way. Right now, the gut feeling is not good but I don't trust my gut any more! :)
I was asked for a time when I was innovative, how I'd deal with an irate customer, what hardware and software I was familiar with, to give an example of a time when I wrote a policy or procedure that was meant for general use. That's about it. I can't think of any more, but as I say, it was really short.
One of the people interviewing me was a resident - a user of the Eastserve scheme. One of them was the scheme/project manager, and one was the "office manager", I think.
I'm not entirely sure how it went. Whether a quick interview is good, bad or indifferent. I'll apparently know by tomorrow afternoon either way. Right now, the gut feeling is not good but I don't trust my gut any more! :)
pessimistic