pmsumner: (webcam bored)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] pmsumner at 11:48pm on 14/08/2007 under
US seeks quicker death sentences

I'm not entirely sure what to think about this story. On one hand I am delighted. I don't see how spending 10yrs in prison waiting for death is justifiable. Yes they could be released if found not-guilty in the meantime but the mental anguish they must go through in that time, and the struggle that they go through on release must be nearly insurmountable.

On the other hand, isn't a large part of the reason it takes so long to allow people the opportunity to appeal and to prove their innocence? If you shorten this then you're shortening someone's chances to live, to be proven innocent.

According to http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20070612-1527-ca-deathrowsuicides.html - the average death row "stay" is 17.5 years!

I'm curious what the suicide rate of people who have been found innocent/released from "death row" is...
Mood:: 'drained' drained
There are 7 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] mooism.livejournal.com at 12:23am on 15/08/2007
I read (in Freakonomics, I think) that a drug dealer has a higher life expectancy on death row than outside.

If you’re going to let your judicial system kill people, waiting 17½ years to kill them is excessive. I know US courts have a reputation for being slow, but that’s ridiculous.
 
posted by [identity profile] thanatosos.livejournal.com at 09:18am on 15/08/2007
Question is, do you think the US will ever actually wake up from its terrifying arrogance and stop the death penalty?
 
posted by [identity profile] phil99.livejournal.com at 09:36am on 15/08/2007
ooo, that's terribly political for this time of the morning.

I'm not convinced that the death penalty in itself is a bad thing. I've read as many arguments for and against as I care to and neither of them are particularly convincing.

I don't think you can call the US arrogant for having the death penalty - after all there are other countries which still kill prisoners legally.
 
posted by [identity profile] thanatosos.livejournal.com at 09:51am on 15/08/2007
The fact that other countries also have the death penalty does not make the US exempt from being accused of arrogance. Any country that still kills people in the name of the law are arrogant, as they are under the delusion that humans have the right to chose when another person lives or dies.

The death penalty is in direct conflict with two articles from the 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights'.

The execution of innocents happens. That is a fact.

Some countries execute political prisoners, and children.

But why listen to me when you could listen to Jeremy Irons?
 
posted by [identity profile] thanatosos.livejournal.com at 10:50am on 16/08/2007
It's gone all quiet in here! I was hoping for a debate.
 
posted by [identity profile] phil99.livejournal.com at 11:10am on 16/08/2007
Unfortunately to construct any kind of response requires that I don't get interrupted by pesky customers/colleagues demanding to know answers to things that are easily resolved with basic troubleshooting techniques.

Small rant aside, I haven't had the time. At home my internet time is severely limited by living with an internet addict (and I mean an addict), and at work I can barely string two sentences together without someone interrupting my train of thought.

(As an example, this comment was started at 11:52 by my clock. It's now 12:09).

I'll get there...
 
posted by [identity profile] thanatosos.livejournal.com at 05:04pm on 16/08/2007
Sorry dude, I didn't realise that your internet access was quite so restricted.

No rush, but I look forward to hearing your views.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31