posted by [identity profile] phil99.livejournal.com at 02:30am on 09/08/2003
Yes, and I don't think they are such a bad idea still. However, this is completely different. This is applying a rule in a very discriminatory fashion. If it were to everyone, fine. If it were to everyone without a machine readable passport, fine. I can see the reasoning for it.

But applying the rules to males only, of a certain age?
Why? It makes no sense.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31